New Zealand should tax the profit people make when they sell an investment property.
This is called a capital gains tax. Right now, most profit from selling a rental or investment property isn't taxed. Every proposal on the table excludes the family home.
ACT
Strongly opposesOpposed. Campaigning explicitly as the party of 'no new taxes' and a faster path to surplus through spending cuts.
ACT: Faster path to surplus, no new taxesGreens
Strongly supportsGoes further, wants a 33% capital acquisitions tax on assets or gifts over $1 million, alongside an annual wealth tax.
Green Party: A tax system for all of usLabour
Strongly supportsCampaigning on a 28% tax on profit from selling investment property from 1 July 2027, with every dollar ring-fenced for health. Excludes the family home, farms, KiwiSaver, shares and businesses.
Hipkins: Labour Congress 2026 speechNational
Strongly opposesOpposed. Campaigning on keeping taxes low and returning to surplus by 2028/29 through spending restraint rather than new taxes.
National: Budget 2026NZ First
Strongly opposesOpposed to new housing-related taxes, framing cost-of-living relief as the priority.
NZ Herald: Peters on immigrationTe Pāti Māori
Strongly supportsWants the wealthiest to 'pay their fair share', with revenue directed to housing, health, education and whānau support.
Te Pāti Māori: Policy
What this means in practice
At the moment, if you buy a rental for $600,000 and sell it for $800,000, that $200,000 gain is usually not taxed at all, while someone earning $200,000 from wages pays tax on every dollar. A capital gains tax would tax the profit when the property is sold, not while you hold it. Every proposal on the table exempts the home you live in.
Supporters say
- Someone making $200,000 selling a property should pay tax on it, just as someone earning $200,000 in wages does. Rent is already taxed as income; the profit on sale mostly isn't.
- New Zealand is one of very few developed countries without one, and it's why so much money goes into houses rather than businesses.
- It raises revenue from a small group without touching most people's income.
Opponents say
- It's a tax on investment, and investment is what builds new houses and businesses in the first place.
- It's complicated and expensive to administer, and creates incentives to just never sell.
- Landlords will pass the cost to tenants as higher rent.